Language learning and e-learning platform audits
We look at the platform, the materials and the marking through the eyes of a student and a teacher – before the results are used for course credit. You receive a report with area ratings, a register of findings and an action plan.
Area ratings
Example – illustrative data
On a scale of 1–5: 5 – ready to use without reservation; 3 – works, but needs fixes before a wider roll-out.
| Area | Rating | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Stability and performance | 5 out of 5 | Courses, exercises and recordings open without delay, even on a slower connection. |
| Exercise marking | 3 out of 5 | Scores appear straight away, but feedback on mistakes is given only in some tasks. |
| Content and CEFR level | 3 out of 5 | Texts are linguistically correct; some modules are harder than their stated level. |
| Audio and video | 4 out of 5 | Recordings are clear; in beginner courses the pace is sometimes too fast. |
| Accessibility (WCAG) | 3 out of 5 | Good contrast and a clear layout; not every exercise can be completed with the keyboard alone. |
| Mobile version | 2 out of 5 | Drag-and-drop exercises are hard to complete on a small screen. |
Severity levels
- critical
- blocks learning or is misleading
- high
- noticeably reduces quality
- medium
- inconsistency or methodological weakness
- low
- cosmetic
Sample finding
Example – illustrative data
highF1
Text difficulty does not match the module’s CEFR label
In some lessons of a B1 module, the texts and vocabulary are at B2 level. Students come across harder material than the course description suggests, and their exercise scores understate their real level.
Recommendation: check the level of the module’s texts (for example against a CEFR vocabulary profile), then either simplify them or move the module to the appropriate level.
How we work
- Automated consistency checks across all course content.
- A full read-through of the courses, with a severity rating and a recommendation for every issue.
- Verification of key findings directly on the platform, using a student account and, with your consent, a teacher account.
We use automated tools and AI; every finding that affects the conclusions is confirmed manually.
What the audit covers
- Functionality and navigation
- Exercises and marking
- Lesson content: accuracy, CEFR level, clarity
- Vocabulary and flashcards
- Audio and video
- Accessibility (WCAG), mobile, performance
- The teacher’s perspective
- How learning is organised: level testing, hours, groups, exams
What you receive
- A summary for university or company leadership
- Area ratings on a 1–5 scale
- Key findings with examples
- A register of all findings with location and recommendation
- A staged action plan: before results are used for course credit, during the semester and in the longer term